Goal factoring is a decision-making technique that encourages identifying and satisfying underlying objectives in everyday choices, helping to find creative and optimal solutions beyond the apparent trade-offs.
Goal factoring is introduced as a pragmatic tool developed by CFAR (Center for Applied Rationality) to aid in effective decision-making. Unlike methods that rely on traditional pros and cons lists, goal factoring pushes for a "third path" that seeks to fulfill all desired outcomes simultaneously. This tool is particularly useful for CFAR alumni, showcasing anecdotal effectiveness in various practical scenarios.
In daily life decision points, such as choosing between a social event and a relaxing night in, goal factoring invites us to look beyond the standard choices. This is exemplified in "The Parable of the Orange," where an unexpected solution satisfies the needs of both parties by uncovering their true intentions for an orange.
The case study of Valentine Smith, a preoccupied professor, showcases goal factoring in action. By dissecting the purpose of student grading, he identifies underlying goals and tests alternative strategies, ultimately leading to an innovative self-grading system that meets his objectives more efficiently than the established method.
This process has five steps: choosing an action to examine, preparing mentally to find the best solution irrespective of current habits, breaking down the chosen action into individual goals, brainstorming alternative means to achieve these goals, and performing a reality check to ensure the new plan is viable.
The technique is further supported by psychological research on goal alignment, divergent thinking, and decision-making heuristics. Key references include works by Kahneman on "narrow framing,” Sheldon and Kasser on the congruence between life goals, and Land and Jarman's studies on creativity.