Private intelligence has significantly expanded post-9/11 to meet increased security demands, with private firms filling operational gaps left by slow government hiring, yet this outsourcing raises complex ethical and operational issues.
🧠Post-9/11 shift: The 9/11 Commission recommended a drastic increase in intelligence operators, leading to a reliance on private firms like Boeing and Raytheon.
🕵️ Flexibility over rigid hiring: With the CIA’s lengthy hiring process, private intelligence became the faster option to scale up operations.
đź’¸ Economic law over legislation: Private intelligence thrives on economic principles; needing to outperform government counterparts to secure contracts.
🔦 Trump’s influence: Trump’s administration highlighted systemic flaws in intelligence operations and used private intelligence to circumvent standard practices.
Key insights
Expansion of Private Intelligence Post-9/11
Following the 9/11 attacks, a commission identified the need for better coordination and increased intelligence manpower.
Government's slow hiring processes led to outsourcing intelligence roles to private companies like Boeing, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman.
Role During Trump Administration
Trump controversially hired private intelligence to run operations, shedding light on intelligence system flaws.
His administration showed high reliance on private intelligence, paying premiums to attract seasoned officers from public sectors.